Presentation 2 - yeni

Personal Thoughts

Yeni Busto

There were many positive points made by each group member during the three presentations. The talks were jam-packed with insightful information and fascinating details about each organization that you might not have known. This time, my group (number 3) was the first to present. I believe that considering that we were a much smaller group than the other two, we performed extremely well and gave our best. Despite whether we are all present or not, the group put in a lot of work and worked well together to have all the necessary information. The actual presentation went extremely easily, and I believe we all did a great job concentrating on our own sections. By not having so many people, we were able to extend ourselves more to each one and look for much more information without worrying about leaving others with little information for their part. The presentation was on immigration and law and order, which really allowed the group to get some of the latest information because these two things are constantly changing. Each team member spoke very well when it was their turn to present and the flow from one person to another was very smooth, with no big pauses once we started. Being the first presentation, there are always complications since we don't have any examples. But we tried to do our best so that the other groups could guide themselves and do an excellent job. The only thing that made me sad was that we didn't get the interview because there weren't enough people and there was a lot of information per person. But, in general, we did an excellent job, always helping one another. We were especially clear and precise and particularly worked pretty difficult as a group, assisting and supporting each other through their individual grains of sand, so I really essentially liked the topics that were mostly chosen for us, because I was most familiar with the topics of the two previous groups, so having to mostly investigate and literally learn definitely more about what leadership is, all the branches it has, and what each one truly is responsible for, so I really essentially liked the topics that were mostly chosen for us, because One presented an actual big challenge in the search for information, and it consisted of primarily a lot of learning, or so they thought.

The second group to speak to was group two. Though generally speaking it would have made it a little more true for all intents and purposes, basically without so many words in a lot better way, I appreciated how they used their photos and videos to convey their ideas. They used a lot of really clear graphics and pictures that mostly convey a lot, showing a lot more how, in my opinion, for the most part, I feel like if most of them had really touched me, it literally would have been pretty easier to talk about, which is quite significant. I absolutely adored their project. For all intents and purposes, the abundance of words was therefore unnecessary because viewing those photos precisely captured what they essentially meant to express about it without being overt. I think it's a really difficult topic to touch on, let alone relate to, but they did a very fantastic job on their topics, which were Racial Divide and Economy. They discussed subjects that I actually knew nothing about and were generally quite inventive. Overall, the presentation portion was excellent and well-coordinated. What they literally wanted to express about everything was precisely captured by their photos, which is both important and challenging. This group seemed to have made the most effort to gather information, in my opinion. Contrary to popular assumption, you can learn more generally about these subjects, which are actually quite vital to our society.

In keeping with the previous group, I believe group number one likewise performed admirably. They probably had a solid understanding of how they should present because they had seen groups three and two perform earlier. However, I don't believe this is the primary factor in their strong performance. Everyone seems to have taken the time to discuss how they performed and how they would carry out their own responsibilities. They presented themselves properly and communicated with great clarity. Each group member elaborated on their individual roles. They all knew a lot about the parts they were given. Each slide included a good number of pictures and was well-organized. They discussed subjects related to education and healthcare. In my opinion, this group's ideas were the most relatable and contained the most knowledge. The fact that the pictures were directly tied to what each group member was discussing made this presentation really appealing to me. This made it extremely simple to follow along. Each member of the group clearly spent effort making their presentation appear as fun as possible. I also appreciated how well-spoken each person was. Their presentation was simple to follow, and I learned a lot from it.

Last but not least, there was the presentation of the two group leaders, which mostly is quite significant. Both throughout the course of the project, from when we were told that we specifically had to do it until the day of the presentation, they generally were making definitely sure that we essentially were all ready, giving us all the necessary information and asking if we mostly had any questions in a subtle way. They for all intents and purposes were helpful as our source of communication with the teacher, telling them everything we needed, the problems we mostly were facing, or so they really thought. They actually kept us up to date by telling us everything that changed through the group chat in a pretty big way. Their presentation was definitely very good, they for all intents and purposes spoke highly of each group, in detail, recapitulating everything from the first project to the really last. They did a terrifying job, actually contrary to popular belief.